1 members (James OConnor),
355
guests, and
109
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,521
Posts417,614
Members6,171
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
|
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23 |
I am researching the historical/theological development of infant communion in the Byzantine Rite of the Ukrainian Catholic Church. Do any of y'all have suggestions of printed or electronic resources which would help in that search?
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766 Likes: 30
John Member
|
John Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766 Likes: 30 |
novocilman, Infant communion goes back to the time of the apostles. It was the custom in the entire Church until the Latin West discontinued it in the middle ages. In many of the Eastern Catholic Churches the custom was dropped in order to imitate more closely the customs of the Latin Church. In the most recent generations the Eastern Catholic Churches have once again begun embracing our authentic Eastern traditions. In the Roman Catholic Church there is a slow but steady process to return the Sacraments of Initiation (Baptism, Chrismation and Eucharist) to their correct order and eventually join them together. The Most Reverend Samuel J. Aqulia, bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fargo, North Dakota wrote a very good pastoral letter on the Sacrament of Confirmation that is worth reading as it provides some insight into the general discussion as well as a good history of the Sacraments of Initiation in the Latin Church. You�ll need the free Adobe Reader to read it: http://www.fargodiocese.org/Bishop/confirmation.pdf Admin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Novocilman,
Actually, a better topic would be on the Zamoisk Synod and the cessation of the practice of Infant Communion . . .
The way you've posted your question does indeed, as the Esteemed Administrator states, appear that you are assuming that the later Latin practice was normative . . .
Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
"Then little children were brought to Jesus for him to place his hands on them and pray for them. But the disciples rebuked those who brought them. Jesus said, 'Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.'" (Matthew 19:13-14)
The earliest explicit reference in the patristic corpus to infant baptism is in the Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus, about 215 A.D.: "Baptize first the children, and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them." (Hippolytus, Apostolic Tradition 21:15)
The practice in the Ruthenian and Kyivan tradition was undoubtedly to baptize, chrismate and communicate infants, until much more recently, as Alex correctly pointed out, the Synods of Zamostya and later L'viv imitated the Latin practice of "first communion at the age of reason". This is most definitely a latinization.
This issue has been settled canonically in the Ukrainian Catholic Church and the traditional practice fully restored. It was the decision of the Synod of the Ukrainian Catholic Church as promulgated on December 24, 1997 to mandate the practice of infant communion within our Church. Some other eparchies had already promulgated local statutes requiring infant communion before the Synodal decision which made the practice consistent for the entire Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Parents do not deny their children food until they are old enough to "understand" food. The life-sustaining qualities of the food are inherent regardless of the ability of the child to understand. It is sufficient that the parents understand. This is even more true for the Eucharist.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
|
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23 |
Thanx boys, I sincerely appreciate the replies; but I 'knew all that'. What I'm trying to do is identify and get my grubbies on the documents/texts which supor that information.
Thanx in advance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
dear NovoCilman: Browsing on the St. Elias "New&Cool" page http://www.saintelias.com/New&Cool/New&Cool.html, I found a great link to the INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLYING THE LITURGICAL PRESCRIPTIONS OF THE CODE OF CANONS OF THE EASTERN CHURCHES promulgated by the Vatican Congregation for the Eastern Churches (can't get much more authoritative than that for those who would deny Infant Communion because it is not "Catholic". The Link was to a EWTN site http://www.ewtn.com/library/curia/eastinst.htm#07, who put up the entire document (a blessing upon them) The most relevant section to your inquiry is: 51. Communion to the neophytes
Can. 697 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches prescribe that the Eucharist be administered as soon as possible after the Baptism and Chrismation with holy Myron, according to the norms of the Church <sui iuris>.
Can. 710 resumes the subject of participation of baptized infants in the Eucharist and exhorts that the prescriptions of the liturgical books of the Church <sui iuris> be observed in its administration.
This legislation, specific to the Eastern Churches, necessitates some clarification.
For reasons already seen, the norms regarding the Communion to neophytes are not found in the legislation of some Eastern Catholic Churches, which have often postponed the first Communion to the school age. Therefore, it will be the task of the competent authorities to adopt measures suitable for returning to the previous practice and to elaborate norms that are more conforming to their own tradition.
As for the prescriptions contained in the liturgical books to the same regard, it should be noted that, in the majority of the cases, whether of these or the Churches which preserve the ancient uses, they do not provide sufficient indications, considering that the Ritual of Baptism in general was conceived for adults and subsequently used for children, without introducing any specific modification in the Eastern Churches. The subject is usually addressed in the pastoral manuals for the sacraments. Some practical suggestions could be obtained from the practices of the Orthodox Churches.
Finally, the administration of the Divine Eucharist to infant neophytes is not limited to only the moment of the celebration of Initiation. Eucharist is the Bread of life, and infants need to be nourished constantly, from then on, to grow spiritually.
The method of their participation in the Eucharist corresponds to their capacity: they will initially be different from the adults, inevitably less aware and not very rational, but they will progressively develop, through the grace and pedagogy of the sacrament, to grow until "mature manhood to the extent of the full stature of Christ" (cf. Eph. 4:13).
The sacrament is always a gift which operates efficiently, in different ways just as every person is different. Special celebrations which correspond to the various steps of human growth can possibly be of some use for the pedagogy of the faith and to accompany specifically the indispensable catechesis of children and young people, but it must be clear that the initiation into the Mystery of Christ is totally complete upon receiving the first three sacraments. Does this address your inquiry? "for Peace for the world, let us beseech the Lord" Herb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766 Likes: 30
John Member
|
John Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766 Likes: 30 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
Dear Administrator:
Thank you for the information.
(and a blessing upon ByzCath too! must scope out that site some more!)
"for Peace for the world, let us beseech the Lord"
Herb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
You have to understand where you have been to know where you are. One can't just regurgitate this or that catechetical canon without understanding where and how they developed. The Scriptural and patristic basis for this practice are important in understanding the context. Hippolytus, Cyprian, Cyril of Jerusalem, St. John Chrystom, St. Basil the Great, Nicholas Cabasilas and many others in the patristic corpus offer invaluable insight into the spiritual and theological thought regarding this sacramental practice. With regard to more current statements of the Church's position in restoring this undeniable part of the Eastern Catholic Church's sacramental tradition, Archbishop Raya's words from the "Face of God" are excellent: "For the Byzantine mentality, the sacraments of Baptism, Chrismation, and Holy Eucharist are one single process by which a person enters the life of the Holy Trinity. The Father creates a new life, the Spirit "seals' it, and the Son nourishes it with his own Body and Blood. We are thus initiated into the life of the Trinity, and we thus partake of the Love that is God.” “Now that all these treasures have been given and received we call on the Holy Spirit to protect, to strength and to "seal' these gifts in the recipient, who is thus called to become a living witness to the goodness and love of God. The newly baptized offers his faith and good will to the sign which imparts grace. He offers his senses and his whole person to be "sealed' by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, the Almighty and Adorable, so that he may be kept in sanctification.” “The Holy Eucharist forms a whole with Baptism and Chrismation. Grace is a principle of life. Final glorification has flowed from the love of the Father and has been bestowed upon the baptized by the Holy Spirit. The person has been sealed by the indwelling of the Spirit who now gives the baptized a new direction and a new mind, the "mind which is in Christ Jesus.' The Holy Eucharist is precisely this new mind. Jesus said, "I am the living Bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this Bread he shall live forever, and the Bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.' (John 6:51)” The address from the chancellor of the Eparchy of Stamford has also some more general considerations of the practice: www.members.tripod.com/~cerkva/communion.html [ members.tripod.com] Also a fairly recent discussion on the Catholic Information Network (CIN) apologetics thread has some good info from various sources regarding this issue incorporating both the position of the Roman and Eastern Catholic Churches: www.cin.org/archives/cinapol/200107/0065.html [ cin.org]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
|
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23 |
Sincere thanx for all the input and context. Y'all provided pretty much what I already had, but that's good - 'cause I didn't know if there were other references or sources for the information.
Diak - u going to the Sloatsburg this spring?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
John, Sloatsburg all depends on my ordination date and remaining funds left after the trip to the cathedral.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
|
Fr. Dc. John Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23 |
Diak,
I hope all goes well and congratulations on your impending ordination. I will not be at Sloatsburg his Spring, but hopefully will be at the Summer intensive.
ZBohom
|
|
|
|
|