The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum
6,178 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 355 guests, and 114 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,525
Posts417,642
Members6,178
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#57914 08/26/06 08:47 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
T
Junior Member
Junior Member
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
I hope this is the correct place for my question.

I was reading last night this thread last night

https://www.byzcath.org/bboard/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=004036


and was a bit bewildered
please would someone explain about this sentence

quote -- it is generally understood that married couples abstain from sexual relations during a fast.


I really do not understand at all

There was also a mention of married saints - did they really have to do this ?

quote - Most married saints, like St. Nicholas Planas, St. Luke of modern Russia, generally ended up widowers, or elderly and in celibate marriages.

Is this the normal thing for all Orthodox people ?

Can you explain why ?

#57915 08/26/06 09:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
TLF-

I'm certainly not an eexpert on any aspect of this question.

But I think the key is "fast". As one quote in the thread explained:

Quote
Abstinence from sexual relations (by mutual consent) is certainly appropriate the evening before receiving the Holy Sacraments, and
during the day that one receives them. It is certainly *not* an absolute "requirement" of the Church to abstain on all fast days (and on the
eves of fast days), or during the 11 days after the Nativity when marriages are not permitted.

The Russian Church in the 13th century issued guidelines for married clergy on these issues, and they included as days of mandatory abstinence
only the first and last week of Great Lent, the two weeks of Dormition Lent, and Wednesdays and Fridays during Nativity Lent and the Lent of the Holy Apostles.

The married state is blessed and the marriage bed is undefiled. The Holy Church in protecting the sanctity of marriage and the well-being of
the spouses, as well as encouraging procreation and the raising of "fair children" has no interest in creating artificial impediments to
preclude spouses from "rejoicing in one another."

If anyone wishes individual guidance on these matters, they should, of course, consult with their Spiritual Father
Hope this helps!

MarkosC

#57916 08/26/06 11:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Dear Thereselefleur,

I think the best answer would be to read up on the lives of the saints. Saints usually reach a time and condition when they are more of a spiritual entity than a physical wordly one. Basically they have attained 'theosis' while still living in this world. It would be impossible, (or so I think), while in this spiritual condition to have carnel/physical desires.

As an example of the state that can be achieved through prayers and the Grace of God: I read recently in a book about a Lutheran minister that went to Mt. Athos. He found himself standing in a church and praying for 18 hours. Now just imagine someone not eating, drinking, sitting, sleeping and conducting any bodily function for 18 hours. He was so amazed that he became an Orthodox monk.

Of course this does not mean that those who have become saints because they have been martyred for the faith, had ever reached that state.

Zenovia

#57917 08/26/06 03:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
It is my personal opinion that there are numerous saints whom we know nothing about because they went about their day to day lives with humility. I have an image in my head of two saints, married, peaceful, walking hand in hand, exuding love and peace. They might very well not have sexual relations in their last years, but they might as well. Either way, they would exude that same peace which comes from an acceptance of Christ. But what of these people ten, twenty, thirty years before? Was it not possible for them to be saints while they were having children or sex? Is it likely that any people who die with a young child at home could not be a saint since they obviously recently had sex? When worded that way, I can't imagine that anyone would agree.

I agree with every sentiment that Alice has in that there is a greatness exuded by certain people here on earth, and that these people typically tend to be celibate. But I just hesitate to say that it is the only way to sainthood, as I think there are many who made it there through small and quiet means unbeknownst to any of us. But since these saints were not large and great, little to nothing is known about them. So it remains my personal opinion that one can reach sainthood through many paths (including parenthood), but that some paths tend to be (rightfully) exalted over others.

#57918 08/26/06 04:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
I think, not being a Dr. Ruth, that most older people don't have the drive for normal relations or the physical capability to do so either. At least that's the way it was in St. Basil the Elder's, John Kronstadt's, and St. Louis IX's day and age. (St. Louis IX king of France, whose feast day was yesterday, and is patron of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, MO.)

Well... except now middle aged and old ladies are now expected to take younger lovers a la Mrs. Robinson and certain celebrities.

And the invention of certain pills that shall remain nameless allow men the opportunity to cheat nature and pursue their appetites.

But I have another question. How do we apply this reasonably without slipping into certain gnostic ideas about matter and spirit?

Saint Basil the Elder had nine children. Saint Louis had eleven children. Saint Monica was the mother of St. Augustine. Saint Margaret of Scotland had eight children. I don't think that conceiving children detracts one from God. And I really don't think that these Holy men and women were distanced from God because of their living in the normal married state

#57919 08/26/06 04:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Having written the above...

The monastic state is better for those who are called to it as they do what the Rich Young Man in the Gospel could not do.

"Sell all your possessions and come and follow Me."

The Apostles did, even St. Peter left his wife (or was she widowed?) and a tradition holds that it was St. Simon the Zealot's wedding at Cana and he left his bride to follow Jesus after the Miracle. As St. Paul said, it is better to be single so as to do only the Lord's will and not that of a spouse or oneself.

But... if a man or woman is not called to the monastic state and he/she joins any way (and manages to slip past the abbot without a vocation) then he/she could be risking his/her soul.

Just like if a man or woman is called to the monastic life and doesn't heed the call and enters marriage, he/she could be risking his/her soul.

My advice on this is, enter either state with extreme caution and get a Spiritual Father who can help discern what to do.


Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0