0 members (),
1,801
guests, and
106
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,508
Posts417,509
Members6,161
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 53
New
|
New
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 53 |
I have only experience this terminology on this board.
Is it a Priest?
Or, Is it a term of respect for a Deacon?
Or have I completely struck out with my assumptions,
Jim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 448 |
It is how you address a deacon. In the Latin Church a deacon should be addressed as "Rev. Mister"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24 |
In conversation a deacon should be addressed as "Fr. Deacon N." in Byzantine Church and "Deacon N." in the Latin Church. In correspondence "Deacon N." is appropriate for both, "Rev. Mr. N." can be used for Latin deacons.
Fr. Deacon Lance
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Member Member
|
Member Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784 |
This has good information on all of this stuff: http://www.saintelias.com/DivServices_elia/ClercAttire/ClercAttire3.html Scroll down about 2/3 of the way down the page. It has how to address deacons, acording to rank and all of that good stuff. Man, that St. Elias website has everything. They should start their own University of something. A Ph.D. in Proper Eastern Liturgics. Imagine that. Enough rambling. -uc
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 780
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 780 |
Just as a point of interest, the title "Rev. Mr." is no longer used in the United States for deacons. This was causing a number of problems since it mixes a clerical title with a lay title continuing the perception that deacons were laity.
For Latin deacons the correct title, both in writing and in speaking, is "Deacon N."
Fr. Deacon Edward
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517 |
A dissenting voice - "Deacon N" is seldom if ever appropriate and has a most undesirable resonance. There is nothing wrong with addressing an envelope to "Father Deacon John Smith" and beginning one's letter "Dear Father Deacon".
Under "useless information" one might note that it is possible for a subdeacon to be a "Monsignor", or at least it would be had the Latins not stopped ordaining subdeacons.
Incognitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943 |
In some Orthodox Churches, I heard people calling their monks "Father N." Same with Deacons. "Father N."
SPDundas Deaf Byzantine
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517 |
Dear SPDundas
For a man who announces his deafness, your hearing is remarkably acute! And your report is accurate.
Incognitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688 |
Originally posted by Peacock 24: I have only experience this terminology on this board.
Is it a Priest?
Or, Is it a term of respect for a Deacon?
Or have I completely struck out with my assumptions,
Jim Jim, in some more informal and familial quarters (like my house), Father Deacon is in fact "my Daddy the Deacon." 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7 |
I researched this some time ago. The title "Father" was once reserved for monastics, East and West. In some European countries, religious Order priests are addressed as Father and diocesan priests as "Priest." For the most part in the US & in England up until the end of the 19th century, Catholic priests were usually addressed as "the Reverend Mister..." In some religious Orders of the West (the Passionists are one), their members were addressed as "Father" once they were ordained to the diaconate. I believe that the present practice in the Melkite Church is to address deacons simply as "Deacon So-and-so."
|
|
|
|
|