The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Jason_OLPH, Twixjudy, samuelthesearcher, Hannah Walters, Harry Kevin
6,195 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (2 invisible), 514 guests, and 126 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,540
Posts417,763
Members6,195
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
#68413 10/05/06 03:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Now, I find all of this fascinating. If we are going to be very technical and strict about this, then it seems that unless an "economia" is granted to one of the spouses, then one of them will be doing something damnable according to their church. The Catholic spouse must promise to raise the children in his faith. The Orthodox spouse must promise to raise the children in her faith. Suppose, there are no exceptions to this: then why would the church even permit intermarriage?

Several months ago, when I mentioned in confession that I was considering becoming Orthodox (I went to a Roman priest at the time) I was told to be very careful, because the fate of my immortal soul rested on the decision.

In light of all of this and the closeness of the two faiths, Roman Catholic and Orthodox, it seems to me that if the Churches are going to allow intermarriage, then they should permit the couples to choose which Church they will raise their kids in, according to what is best in their circumstances. I like the way that this is done in the middle east. In Christ,

Joe

#68414 10/05/06 03:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Quote
Originally posted by Teen Of The Incarnate Logos:
Young Fogey,

Just for clarification, are you saying that now the Catholic parent is the one that has to promise to raise the children in the Church, and not the non-Catholic parent?

That would make more logical sense, since the non-Catholic parent would logically feel little incentive to go through with a promise made to a Church which he or she doesn't even believe is the True Church.

Logos Teen
The requirement is predicated on the general rule that prohibits a mixed marriage between a Catholic and a non-Catholic.

However, the exception is the norm: a dispensation from the above rule when sought by the Catholic party is almost always granted by the local ordinary but who would:

(1) require the Catholic party to declare that he or she is prepared to remove dangers of defecting from the faith and to make a sincere promise to do all in his or her power in order that all the children be baptized and brought up in the Catholic Church;

(2) inform in good time the other (non-Catholic) party of these promises to be made by the Catholic party, so that it is certain that he or she is truly aware of the promise and of the obligation of the Catholic party; and

(3) instruct both parties about the purposes and essential properties of marriage (as viewed by the Catholic Church), which are not to be excluded by either contractant.

(Cf. Canons 1124 thru 1129, 1983 Code of Canons.)

Amado

#68415 10/05/06 03:46 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Amado,

The part where #1 says, "make a sincere promise to do all in his or her power in order that all the children be baptized and brought up in the Catholic Church;" seems to make this exception "almost always" given by the local ordinary when petitioned, moot anyway, since that basically amounts to a promise to raise the kids Catholic.

Similarly, annulments are almost always granted by today's wayward episcopate... frown

Logos Teen

#68416 10/05/06 04:07 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
Quote
If we are going to be very technical and strict about this, then it seems that unless an "economia" is granted to one of the spouses, then one of them will be doing something damnable according to their church.

...[the RC rule] basically amounts to a promise to raise the kids Catholic.
Yeppers.

Each side allows a mixed marriage if the non-member spouse agrees to be in bad standing in his or her church by allowing the kids to be outside that church.

As hurtful and unfair as that sounds it makes sense considering each side's one-true-church teaching.

#68417 10/05/06 04:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
The non-Catholic parent is not, repeat, not, required to promise to raise the child or children as Catholics. Among other things, this means that if the Catholic parent dies, leaving very young children, the surviving spouse has not the slightest Church-imposed obligation to raise those children as Catholics (what the deceased spouse may have asked the surviving spouse directly is not at issue here).

The Catholic parent is normally - but not invariably - required to promise to raise the child or children as Catholics. Under some circumstances, the Catholic hierarchy is willing to give some dispensations. "Princess Michael of Kent" is a recent prominent example. Others could easily be cited.

Fr. Serge

#68418 10/05/06 05:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
Quote
Originally posted by Serge Keleher:
The non-Catholic parent is not, repeat, not, required to promise to raise the child or children as Catholics.
I think that's already been said.
Quote
Originally posted by Serge Keleher:
The Catholic parent is normally - but not invariably - required to promise to raise the child or children as Catholics.
That means the non-RC or non-Eastern Catholic has to stand back and let the RC (etc.) take over the religious upbringing of the kids, no different really from making them promise to raise them under Rome.

#68419 10/05/06 05:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
I would like to see a little more respect afforded to our clergy on this board. We are fortunate that they take the time to give us their expert advice, opinions, and knowledge. We are also fortunate that they take the time to respond to us and to share their lifetimes of experience serving in the Church, East and/or West.

Addressing clergy in the proper form would be a nice beginning...not only would it be polite, but it is also an Eastern ecclesial tradition.

Thank you.

Alice, Moderator

#68420 10/05/06 05:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
Quote
Several months ago, when I mentioned in confession that I was considering becoming Orthodox (I went to a Roman priest at the time) I was told to be very careful, because the fate of my immortal soul rested on the decision.
How sad. I hope the prospective spouse to be in this thread isn't met with such prejudice.

Andrew

#68421 10/05/06 06:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Quote
Originally posted by The young fogey:
Quote
If we are going to be very technical and strict about this, then it seems that unless an "economia" is granted to one of the spouses, then one of them will be doing something damnable according to their church.

...[the RC rule] basically amounts to a promise to raise the kids Catholic.
Yeppers.

Each side allows a mixed marriage if the non-member spouse agrees to be in bad standing in his or her church by allowing the kids to be outside that church.

As hurtful and unfair as that sounds it makes sense considering each side's one-true-church teaching.
I understand the logic and perhaps, both Churches have no other choice, at least as long as they consider themselves to be exclusively, the true Church. One wonders why the dispensation to marry a non-(fill in the blank here; Orthodox or Catholic) is given in the first place. I believe that this is a relatively modern practice. In Christ,

Joe

#68422 10/05/06 06:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
I don't know if this belongs on a new thread, if so, let me know and I will start it; but I've often wondered why the Roman Catholic Church permits Catholics to marry non-Christians, especially in light of St. Paul's injunction to widows that they are free to marry, "but marry in the Lord." It is my understanding that the Orthodox Churches absolutely forbid marriage to an unbaptized person. Am I correct in this?

Joe

#68423 10/05/06 06:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
Quote
Originally posted by JSMelkiteOrthodoxy:
One wonders why the dispensation to marry a non-(fill in the blank here; Orthodox or Catholic) is given in the first place.
Because not every non-blank is devout so he or she has no problem raising the children in the spouse's church.

#68424 10/05/06 06:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 533
Likes: 2
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 533
Likes: 2
Dear Joe,You are correct,the Orthodox Church will(except in the case of zealous OLd Calendarist groups) permit marriage between an Orthodox and non-Orthodox CHRISTIAN,i.e.,someone who has been baptised in the Name of the Holy Trinity.RC's,Lutherans, and most Protestants would qualify,Mormons,Quakers, and Jehovah's Witnesses would not.

#68425 10/05/06 06:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Quote
Originally posted by Fr. Al:
Dear Joe,You are correct,the Orthodox Church will(except in the case of zealous OLd Calendarist groups) permit marriage between an Orthodox and non-Orthodox CHRISTIAN,i.e.,someone who has been baptised in the Name of the Holy Trinity.RC's,Lutherans, and most Protestants would qualify,Mormons,Quakers, and Jehovah's Witnesses would not.
Father Al,

Thank you, that is what I thought. It seems to be more biblical and in line with the Tradition to me than the practice of permitting Catholics to marry non-Christians.

Still, I must say that it saddens me that the two Churches closest to one another (Catholic and Orthodox) cannot work out a solution that leaves both partners of the Catholic-Orthodox marriage in good standing with their Churches; unless of course, they never had children (because it was impossible). Then there would be no problem. In Christ,

Joe

#68426 10/06/06 02:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
My thanks to Alice for her timely and appropriate comment.

It is always theoretically possible to turn the Gospel into the Bad News. I am aware from empirical observation that there are people who actively want to do this (I can find that in certain parishioners), but I must admit that this attitude seriously puzzles me. It is difficult to avoid thinking of the words of Our Savior about those who impose heavy burdens but offer no help to remove them.

Consider the cases which have been raised: we have moved from a request for helpful advice to a young couple, one Orthodox, the other Catholic, who wish to get married - to a discussion of the hypothetical marriage of a Christian to a non-Christian. Excuse me, but the cases are radically dis-similar. It is possible, granted, to find both Catholics and Orthodox who consider the "other" the equivalent of unbaptized heathens, but that opinion is certainly not typical of either the Catholics or the Orthodox.

If someone genuinely wants to find Catholic or Orthodox clergy who take such a fanatical, extremist position, I could - but won't - direct you to them. I won't, because in my serious opinion that would be to encourage people in a major offense against God, who did not become Man to tell us to hate one another (and I have already heard the argument that calling each other unbaptized heathens is actually an expression of love, so don't bother to repeat it).

For people who want pastoral help, I do my inadequate best. For people who want a deeper understanding of the Church and her teaching, I also do my inadequate best, with the caveat that the Church is ultimately a Mystery and the more we learn, the more we realize how slender our knowledge is.

But for people who are looking for someone to apply the Church to them as a religious whip, please look elsewhere.

Fr. Serge

#68427 10/06/06 08:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
I thank you Father Serge for your post and for all your pastoral input.

With this excellent post, I will close the thread...as Father has pointed out, it has gone beyond its original topic and intention.

Alice, Moderator

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0