The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum
6,178 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (San Nicolas), 374 guests, and 133 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,524
Posts417,640
Members6,178
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Quote
Originally posted by thirdpew:
I agree wholeheartedly with John's post.
Pride...some people are full of it.
Sorry for not being more "PC" to all those chastizers out there. A clever way to obvuscate the issue.
BTW, I don't care if married priests are allowed. I'm all for choice. I just don't think it will solve the vocation crisis OK?
JMVFTTP
1) True, many are filled with pride. They must take the Log out of their eye before they can proceed to take the speck out of their brothers.

2) The issue of Primacy is more complicated than simply slinging verses around.

3) The Churches have been arguing over this since 1054. If were as easy saying hey... Matt 16:18 this issue would have been solved years ago

4) I am convinced that the western lung of the Church isn't ready for a married priesthood. Because they have the wrong idea and basis for this. Choice isn't the issue, the issue is vocation. The West has embraced choice to mean that a person can choose anthing at any time, when just the opposite is true. A priest who is ordained, and is single will always be celebate, a married man who is then called to the vocation of Priesthood will be married, but when his wife dies, he will embrace the celebate life.

5) There is no vocation crisis. Where the faith is preached in truth, vocations are no problem. It is where the faith is lukewarm and the faith has been watered down is where there is a lack of vocations.

6) The life of John Paul II, and his death and his final pilgrimage which started when he died, will do more to foster vocations. I believe in the next few years there will be more priests raised up by this holy man than we will be able to count.

John Gibson

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
D
djs Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Quote
I could turn your logic around and ask how Catholics wiggle out of Christ's unequivocal words that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26), but I am not that mean.
Dave, Catholics don't wiggle at all on this point; none denies that the Spirit procedes from the Father - none. Or are you, like Luther in another context, inserting "alone" into the verse?
wink

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Quote
Originally posted by thirdpew:
Of course with that line of thinking (one among equals), they (Orthodox) can be lumped in with the Protestants who say �The Rock� thing is only a metaphor, like the words "this IS my body.....this IS my blood. Do the Orthodox believe those words were just "metaphors" too?
Now who�s really �pro-test-tating?�
Third Pew,

I'm curious about your declaration of member status as "used to be" but, that aside, this suddenly pervasive notion here that "Orthodox = Protestants" is one that I find disturbing and redolent of one readily subscribed to on any number of conservative Latin Catholic boards. With all due respect to our Protestant brethren who post here, I find it to be counter to the understanding of Orthodoxy as enunciated by His Holiness John Paul II, of blessed memory.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
T
used to be
used to be
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
OK, so you think my opinion stinks.
You missed the point of that quote from my post.
My premise is that both the Orthodox and Protestants take Our Lord's words when He calls Peter the Rock "on which I will build my church," as a metaphor because they don't believe that Peter/The Pope heads the Universal Church with "authority." you know, bind and loose; feed my sheep; etc., at least the Orthodox do see the Bishop of Rome as the Patriarch of the West, but that's about it.

In other wordsm he should stay in the West!
Now, Protestants do not believe in Transubstantiation. Orthodox do.
Both come from Christ's lips to His Apostles.

All I'm saying is that you can't have it both ways. Either Our Lord's words, in these two matters specifically, are to be believed without eqivocation or not.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,724
Likes: 2
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,724
Likes: 2
I don't consider the Orthodox to be Protestant, since that historically began in Northern Europe. But let me share an aside I remember reading years ago - and don't ask for a source since it's too far in the past. I remember reading that the Patriarch of Constantinople sent word to the Church of England when it broke away from Catholicism, congratulating it on becoming "Protestant," too.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
Quote
Originally posted by djs:
Dave, Catholics don't wiggle at all on this point; none denies that the Spirit procedes from the Father - none. Or are you, like Luther in another context, inserting "alone" into the verse?
wink
Wow, I've been compared to a lot of things and a lot of people, but that is the first time me and Luther have been put together. wink

No, I'm not adding "alone" to the verse. (I'm also familiar enough with the long and complicated history of the Filioque to not condemn those who use it.)

In the same way, though, the Petrine verse doesn't say the church would be built on Peter's rock alone. Orthodox often view the promises to the Apostle Peter (the rock, the keys, binding and remitting, etc.) as being part of the ministry of all bishops. This was elaborated a bit in a good explanation of the Orthodox POV that was posted on this Forum just a short time ago:

https://www.byzcath.org/bboard/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=001313

Dave

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
D
djs Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
That's is a much better response to 3rdpew.

The comparison was made with a wink - of course.
But "alone" was actually added to the verse by a poster here, a couple of years ago. I still lapse into shock when jogged to remember it.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
T
used to be
used to be
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
Yea, yea, yea, but why did Christ "single out" Peter?
Why didn't He just say "Amen, Amen, I say to all of you simply; "all of you are the rock(s) that I will...."?
Jesus might have misspoken???

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Quote
Originally posted by thirdpew:
Yea, yea, yea, but why did Christ "single out" Peter?
Why didn't He just say "Amen, Amen, I say to all of you simply; "all of you are the rock(s) that I will...."?
Jesus might have misspoken???
Third,

There are many questions, why didn't Christ kick Judas out since he knew that he would betray him? Because God wants all mean to be saved. At any time, Judas could have repented, sadly he did not.

I believe that you are looking at surface issues, and not looking deeply into the problems. You are looking through the lens of the Roman Catholic. I too used to look at the world through that lens. However to tackle the problems of unification, we must be able to bend our minds and start looking at the Primacy of Peter in view of the Orthodox. I will admit that I have a hard time with that, being a Roman and all that. However since migrating toward the Eastern Catholic Churches, I have become a deeper thinking and a more complete Catholic in the process. Less of "Can't you guys read the fricking verse???!!" and more of "How did the Fathers of the Church see this pre 400, what happened between the time of 400ad and 1054ad to cause us to become so polarized in the first place? And what has been the view from 1054ad that will give us the lens that will help us understand the entire situation.

Again, you have to realize that unification isn't as simple as tossing verses around. There is more to it, there are humans on either side, and when you deal with humans you get a whole mix of emotions. For many the scars run deep and there is much mistrust on either side. How do heal a cut where the scab has been picked off many times?

I wish unification were as easy as going up and saying... The bible says "xxxxxx," but it isn't. There is no easy answer, and what you lead off with was the easy answer.

John

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 641
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 641
Hello Father Gregory. I am always saddened by the misunderstanding between Catholics and Orthodox. Perhaps it is true that we always hurt those whom we are closest to.

If my own family could have harmony and mutual respect and never have a Catholic parent or brother or sister or cousin call an Orthodox parent or brother or sister or cousin a "heretic" or "misguided" or vice versa, then I think there is hope for us all.

As someone quoted once awhile ago and I'm guessing it was Alex, "there are no schisms in heaven." It is the work of all of us to seek peace and understanding among faithful apostolic Christians. To pursue that path is to pursue the path of the apostles and to follow the recent example of our departed Pope of blessed memory.


Quote
Originally posted by Father Gregory:
Dear Thirdpew, CHRIST IS RISEN! One question only: Do you really think that your post reflects the tone and attitude of His Holiness, the late Pope John Paul the Great??? Answer: Errr...awww...well, no, I guess it really doesn't, does it?

I'm seeing quite enough arrogance from my own side (the Orthodox) these days. I don't really think that anyone will be brought closer to unity with this attitude of triumphalism (which is how you are coming off here). Rather we should concentrate on the example of humility and charity that the Holy Father has shown us for the past 26+ years---that my dear brother and sisters will bring about the Lord's desire, 'that all be one as the Father and I are One.' I'll even go a step further and suggest that THE reason why we're still separate 'lungs' of the same Church is this attitude of triumphalism. It is in the end, a sin against unity...period. May the Lord for forgive us all!

And to think that we're suppose to be trying to take the Holy Father's teaching to heart---especially during these days! Lord have mercy!

In the Risen Lord,
+Fr. Gregory frown

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
T
used to be
used to be
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
Post edited by Admin to remove offensive content.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 542
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 542
How about -

First, we decide to become friends with each other and stop fighting about what happened in 1054 and what the role of the Pope should be?

The Schism is a terrible thing but it will never be resolved with Scripture quotes or early Church council minutes or anything like that. Only a deisre, filled with Christian love, to do waht jesus would have us do will bring about healing.

I think that the Western Church should take a break from ecumenism and try to get its own house in order. We have no business pointing fingers at anyone - and that goes for me.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
Quote
Originally posted by thirdpew:
I remember when the HF wished to visit Russia. Alas, he never got there.
The Orthodox, being ther great Ecumenicals they are, would allow , again, "allow" him (PJP2) to visit Russia.......... with conditions.
And many Orthodox (myself included) are sad over this. I know a sweet elderly Polish Orthodox woman at the church I attend while at school; she actually met the now-reposed Pope two or three times when he was a cardinal in Poland. She was very sad that the Pope was unable to visit Russia, and rightly stated the reason: politics.

We must also remember that, while he did not get to visit Russia, he did get to go to numerous other "Orthodox" nations.

Quote
What nerve! They'd probably insist Christ's second coming be allowed only in klobuk and veil!
Who leaked out that information?! We were trying to keep that a secret from all the non-Orthodox! Operation "Parousia Epikalimafkion" has been compromised! ABORT! ABORT!

wink

Dave

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
T
used to be
used to be
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
Finally, someone with a sense of humor in this forum!
Mazeltoff!

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,310
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,310
Quote
Originally posted by Chtec:
Who leaked out that information?! We were trying to keep that a secret from all the non-Orthodox! Operation "Parousia Epikalimafkion" has been compromised! ABORT! ABORT!

wink

Dave
ROTF biggrin biggrin biggrin

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0