2 members (Hutsul, 1 invisible),
352
guests, and
90
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 80
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 80 |
I need to know the answer to this question, does anyone here know the answer?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 179
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 179 |
You'll probably get some arguments here Xristoforos, but based on traditional Catholic thought as well as the Code of Canon Law for both Eastern Catholics and Western Latin Catholics, the answers is a clear 'yes'.
Second Vatican Council's Lumen Gentium explicitly restates the ecumenical dogmatic authority of Trent.
Regards, Robster
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8 |
I, as an Eastern Catholic, reject the ecumenicity of all fourteen later Latin Church councils.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 94
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 94 |
It is a topic of debate, regardless of the wishfull thinking of canon lawyers. Traditional Catholic thinking would regard Trent as an important general Council, but not in the same sense of the 7 Ecumenical Councils. The numbering system that would include Trent or Vatican II as Ecumenical is entirely modern. Apparently, the modern numbering system began with overzelous Eastern Catholics bullying the Orthodox...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571 |
It is a topic of debate, regardless of the wishfull thinking of canon lawyers. Traditional Catholic thinking would regard Trent as an important general Council, but not in the same sense of the 7 Ecumenical Councils. The numbering system that would include Trent or Vatican II as Ecumenical is entirely modern. Apparently, the modern numbering system began with overzelous Eastern Catholics bullying the Orthodox... And since Vatican II was finished in 1965, that would be entirely appropriate! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcf02/dcf021dbde516b34f8cf7458572ec1c72e4a393a" alt="biggrin biggrin" I don't think there is an "official list" of ecumenical councils maintained anywhere in the Vatican, though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,384 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,384 Likes: 31 |
I, as an Eastern Catholic, reject the ecumenicity of all fourteen later Latin Church councils. For another opinion (I trust the translator has got it right.) [ link [ christusrex.org] ]: On October 11, 1962, the first day of the Council, Pope John delivered this address in St. Peter's Basilica. The Councils -- both the twenty ecumenical ones and the numberless others...It is but natural that in opening this Universal Council... Ecumenical Councils, whenever they are assembled... As regards the initiative for the great event which gathers us here, it will suffice to repeat as historical documentation our personal account of the first sudden bringing up in our heart and lips of the simple words, "Ecumenical Council." ... we wish to narrate before this great assembly our assessment of the happy circumstances under which the Ecumenical Council commences... The greatest concern of the Ecumenical Council is this: that he sacred deposit of Christian doctrine should be guarded and taught more efficaciously... That is, the Twenty-first Ecumenical Council, which will draw upon the effective and important wealth of juridical, liturgical, apostolic, and administrative experiences, wishes to transmit the doctrine, pure and integral, without any attenuation or distortion, which throughout twenty centuries, notwithstanding difficulties and contrasts, has become the common patrimony of men... That being so, the Catholic Church, raising the torch of religious truth by means of this Ecumenical Council... Venerable brothers, such is the aim of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council... Dn. Anthony
|
|
|
|
|